Missed milestones raise concerns about Australia’s Future Submarine Programme

by | 10th March 2020 | News

Home News Missed milestones raise concerns about Australia’s Future Submarine Programme

Warship Technology: March 2020Missed milestone

At a reported cost in the order of A$80 billion (US$55 billion), the design and construction of the Royal Australian Navy’s new-generation ‘Future Submarine’ programme is the largest Defence procurement in Australia’s history.

 

The decision not to acquire a military‐off‐the-shelf submarine platform, and instead engage a ‘strategic partner’ to design and deliver the submarines with significant Australian industry input, has increased the risk associated with the acquisition and there is ongoing parliamentary and community interest and debate about the Department of Defence’s management of the programme.

 

The submarines are to be designed and constructed by Naval Group Australia at the Osborne Shipyard in South Australia. Lockheed Martin Australia is the combat system integrator. A key agreement, the Future Submarine Strategic Partnering Agreement, was signed by Defence and Naval Group on 11 February 2019. The first contract entered into under the Strategic Partnering Agreement was the Submarine Design Contract signed on 1 March 2019. The first Future Submarine is expected to enter service in 2034. The submarines, a total of 12 currently, are being procured to replace the fleet of six Collins class submarines currently operated by the Royal Australian Navy (Navy), which without an extension to their service life, are due to be withdrawn from service by 2036.

 

The programme is already said to be running nine months behind schedule, and two key design milestones for the new submarines have been extended. Concerns about the cost and capability of the submarines have rarely been out of the headlines, the original cost of the programme having been estimated at A$50 billion. Concern has also been expressed about the negotiation of the Strategic Partnering Agreement with Naval Group and the French government; the possible emergence of a capability gap; the planned life-of-type extension of the Collins class to address any capability gap; and the Department of Defence’s Naval Shipbuilding Plan.

 

Now a report by the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) has raised fresh concerns about the programme.

Related Posts

ICCAS 2024 conference featured in ‘SWZ|Maritime’

ICCAS 2024 conference featured in ‘SWZ|Maritime’

RINA’s 2024 International Conference on Computer Applications in Shipbuilding (ICCAS), which was hosted in Genoa in September last year, has received an in-depth write-up in Dutch publication SWZ|Maritime. The article, authored by editor Annelinde Gerritsen, reports...

News from the WA Section November 2024

News from the WA Section November 2024

RINA WA at Fremantle Maritime Day –– 2 November 2024 This year’s Fremantle maritime Day was held on Saturday 2 November 2024 at the Fremantle Passenger Terminal with more than 90 displays, free harbour boat rides, tours of tugs and emergency-response vessels, Border...

News from the Victoria Section November 2024

News from the Victoria Section November 2024

Technical Presentation –– 25 September 2024 Lars Holterud Aarsnes, Head, Maritime Advisory, South East Asia, Pacific and India, DNV Singapore, gave a presentation on Digital Twins via Zoom to a meeting at Navantia Australia in the Aquavista Tower, Docklands, and...

News from the Tasmania Section November 2024

News from the Tasmania Section November 2024

Technical Presentation –– 8 October September 2024  Graeme Elphinstone, Principal of Elphinstone Engineering, gave a presentation on Antarctic Expedition Programs to a meeting at Taylor Bros Marine in Hobart, Zoomed to the Australian Maritime College in Launceston,...